New York Casino Voter Referendum Wording Challenged by Attorney

New York Casino Voter Referendum Wording Challenged by Attorney

A November ny State casino referendum for voters has one lawyer questioning the ballot’s wording

In November, New York voters are scheduled to vote on a referendum that will allow several casino that is new to be built through the entire state. But if one Brooklyn lawyer is successful, that referendum shall be halted due to language in the ballot question which he claims violates state law.

Referendum Language Questioned

The language in the referendum carries a amount of ‘legislative purposes’ that paint the proposition in an unmistakably positive light. For instance, the question mentions ‘promoting work growth, increasing aid to schools and permitting local governments to lower property taxes.’ That language was authorized by the State Board of Elections in July.

But now, lawyer Eric J. Snyder is contending that the language in the bill violates New York legislation. In accordance with a lawsuit filed into the New York State Supreme Court, Snyder alleges that the language violates the continuing State Constitution’s prohibition on the utilization of public money in the aid of ‘private undertakings.’

‘The Constitution is pretty clear that you cannot use general public cash to sway or influence a vote,’ Snyder said.

Snyder isn’t the one that is only has brought up indian dreaming slot big win difficulties with the language into the referendum. Many government watchdog groups also see it as one-sided, and religious groups have also noted the language used whenever telling parishioners to consider social ills that could come along with the advertised advantages of casino expansion. (بیشتر…)